The quality of the first blog went the furthest in depth into what it was trying to convey. The entire blog is in a handout form illustrating how to use and develop interpersonal skills. The blog explains right off the bat what its purpose is. This is great for readers of the blog, because then they know right away what they are about to read. In this blog, there is also an abstract that explains what points are going to be expressed: theory of the mind, transactional analysis and the social perception theory and how they relate to developing communication skills. It goes far into the realms of these theories, providing charts and graphs to explain each one. The format of the blog is attractive.
There is one comment to this blog. This comment essentially critiques the entire blog. The writer of the comment also gives the writer of the blog suggestions on how to make their ideas better. There are also a few typos within the comment, but they don’t take away from the larger picture.
The second blog, entitled “Interpersonal Communication” is of amazing quality as well. Here, the author explaining different communication in the break up of a relationship. It doesn’t go as far into detail as the first blog did, but it explains negative and positive managment in this situation. The format of the blog is attractive and it is easy to locate links within the blog. There are no comments to the blog. This was a bit disappointing because I wanted to hear what others had to say on such an interesting outlook on communication in relationships.
The third blog was called, “Criticism”. Overall, it was the poorest written blog I read. It had good ideas and shared some interesting views on how we communicate when we criticise someone, but the ideas seemed a bit random at times and there wasn’t a steady flow to the blog. The layout of the blog, like the others was attractive, and it was easy to find other things on the page. Again, I was disappointed to see there were no comments to this blog.
